|
|
|
The Lanier Law Firm Announces $6.5 Million Verdict
Law Firm News |
2007/05/08 16:22
|
The Lanier Law Firm is announcing a $6.5 million verdict handed down in favor of a permanently injured oil filed worker after jurors found that negligence on the part of two companies caused the man's injuries.Attorney Judson A. Waltman of The Lanier Law Firm represented plaintiff George Coley along with co-lead counsel Chris Carver of Lubbock, Texas-based Gibson Carver, L.L.P. Mr. Coley, 51, was severely injured on Dec. 31, 2003, when he was struck by an 800-pound casing pipe that had fallen from 30 feet above. The impact crushed his left elbow and caused multiple fractures in his left arm. Doctors say Mr. Coley will have limited use of the arm for the rest of his life. Witnesses testified during trial that the pipe came loose from a nubbin that was being used to lift the pipe before striking Mr. Coley, a subcontractor employed by Lewis Casing Crews of Odessa, Texas. In the lawsuit against Big Dog Drilling and Endeavor Energy Resources, Mr. Coley's attorneys said that managers with the two Midland, Texas, companies ignored Mr. Coley's concerns about the condition of the nubbin and told him to go back to work. "This jury sent a clear message that worker safety comes first," says Mr. Waltman of The Lanier Law Firm. "The first response from the drilling company was to get the drilling operation restarted before caring for Mr. Coley's injuries. That kind of attitude is unacceptable in any work environment, and the jury felt compelled to react accordingly." The verdict was reached on May 1 before state district judge Jay Gibson in Wood County. The award includes $1.58 million in actual damages and $4.92 million in punitive damages. Jurors assessed $420,000 in punitive damages against Big Dog Drilling and $4.5 million against Endeavor Energy. With offices in Houston and New York, The Lanier Law Firm is committed to addressing client concerns with effective and innovative solutions. The firm is composed of outstanding trial attorneys with decades of experience handling cases involving pharmaceutical liability, asbestos exposure, business fraud, serious personal injuries, product liability, and toxic exposure. Lanier Law Firm CONTACT: Kevin Roberts of Lanier Law Firm, +1-713-659-5200 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rosner & Mansfield, LLP Honored by Bar Association
Law Firm News |
2007/05/08 15:57
|
Rosner & Mansfield, LLP was selected by the San Diego County Bar Association as the recipient of its annual award "For Outstanding Public Service By A Law Firm" at a ceremony on May 4th.
The firm was recognized for its successful challenge to the City of
Escondido's illegal immigrant rental ban. The ground-breaking case was one
of the first of the so-called 'anti-immigrant municipal legislation' cases
to be adjudicated in the United States.
As the lead counsel of a coalition of civil rights groups, private
attorneys and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), partner Alan
Mansfield of Rosner & Mansfield first obtained a temporary restraining
order shortly after the Escondido City Council passed the legislation. He
followed that success with an agreement negotiated with Escondido where the
City agreed to be permanently enjoined from ever visiting the racially
divisive issue again. In addition the City agreed to a six figure settlement.
Alan Mansfield said, "I'm proud to have spearheaded the defense of
civil rights for all, including immigrants, and was gratified to achieve
such a speedy, positive and just conclusion to legislation that was so
racially charged and divisive. To be recognized by the San Diego County Bar
Association is both gratifying and exciting and I thank the association for
this award."
The firm was also recognized for giving lectures and seminars to JAG
officers at both Camp Pendleton and the Naval Justice school in San Diego.
Rosner & Mansfield, LLP with offices in San Diego, is one of the
nation's leading consumer protection law firms.
www.rosnerandmansfield.com |
|
|
|
|
|
Frank Schilt pleads guilty to murder of wife
Court Feed News |
2007/05/08 11:44
|
A man accused of killing his wife and dumping her body in a landfill pleaded guilty on Monday. In September, a judge ordered Frank Schilt to stand trial for the murder of his wife, Terri, although her body was never found. Schilt originally entered a not guilty plea on December 6. Schilt entered the guilty plea to a second-degree murder charge in exchange for lowering the charge from first-degree murder and dismissing the other charges. Schilt will be sentenced on August 6th, and is expected to serve between 32 and 48 years. Amy Schilt, Frank Schilt's oldest daughter, stated that the new plea was agreed on by all involved, and was intended to spare the family the drama of a trial. "We support the fact that he is pleading guilty to second-degree murder" Amy told reporters, "because it would be better for everyone, so that we could kind of move on with our lives, and get over a lot of these things without it coming back in our faces." Terri Schilt was reported missing in March 2006, and was believed to have been killed in late February of that year. |
|
|
|
|
|
Cho didn‘t get court-ordered treatment
Legal Career News |
2007/05/08 09:43
|
The gunman who killed 32 people at Virginia Tech failed to get the mental health treatment ordered by a judge who declared him an imminent threat to himself and others, a newspaper reported Monday. However, neither the court nor community mental health officials followed up on the judge‘s order, and Cho didn‘t get the treatment, The Washington Post reported, citing unidentified authorities who have seen Cho‘s medical files. Federal, state and local officials contacted Monday by The Associated Press said they had no idea whether Cho received the treatment because they are not privy to that information. School officials did not return calls seeking comment. On Dec. 13, 2005, Cho e-mailed a roommate at Virginia Tech in Blacksburg saying that he might as well commit suicide. The roommate called police, who took Cho to the New River Valley Community Services Board, the area‘s mental health agency. On Dec. 14, special judge Paul M. Barnett found that Cho was an imminent danger to himself and ordered him into involuntary outpatient treatment. Special justices are lawyers with some expertise and training who are appointed by the jurisdiction‘s chief judge. The court doesn‘t follow up because "we have no authority," Teel said. Virginia law says community services boards "shall recommend a specific course of treatment and programs" for people such as Cho who are ordered to receive outpatient treatment. It also says these boards "shall monitor the person‘s compliance."
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tomlinson Zisko to disband after nearly 25 years
Law Firm News |
2007/05/07 20:49
|
The firm's co-founders, William Zisko and Timothy Tomlinson, said they are joining the East Palo Alto office of Greenberg Traurig LLP, which has grown its Silicon Valley office to 43 lawyers since opening in 2004. Tomlinson Zisko has three other lawyers, all of whom said they are joining other law firms in the area. Tomlinson Zisko had as many as 20 lawyers at its peak in 2000. But retirements and defections reduced the firm's headcount to five today. Tomlinson said the firm's dissolution is "amicable. We just reached too small a size to serve our clients' needs ... It was a great run." The firm advised clients on matters involving corporate finance, securities, intellectual property, litigation, tax and real estate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rosen Law Firm Files Class Action vs. Inphonic, Inc.
Law Firm News |
2007/05/07 18:09
|
The Rosen Law Firm today announced that it has filed a class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on behalf of all purchasers of the common stock of Inphonic, Inc. (the "Company" or "Inphonic") (NASDAQ: INPC) during the period from August 2, 2006 through May 3, 2007.
The complaint charges that Inphonic and certain of its officers and directors violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by issuing materially false and misleading statements concerning the Company's 2006 fiscal year financial results in violation of the federal securities laws and generally accepted accounting principles. The Complaint alleges that during the Class Period the Company materially misrepresented its net income for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 and the interim second, third, and fourth quarters. The Complaint also alleges that the Company improperly recognized revenues for certain cancelled consumer contracts, as well as other errors in the income statement. The Complaint alleges that the cumulative effect of all these errors caused an aggregate net loss of at least $43 to $49 million for fiscal 2006, as compared to the $17.3 million net loss from continuing operations the Company preliminarily announced for fiscal 2006. The Complaint also asserts that certain officers and directors of the Company were able to sell significant amounts of stock during the Class Period while the stock was artificially inflated. As a result of these adverse events, the Complaint asserts that shareholders were damaged. A class action lawsuit has already been filed on behalf of Inphonic shareholders. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court within 90 days of today. If you wish to join the litigation or to discuss your rights or interests regarding this class action, please contact plaintiff's counsel, Laurence Rosen, Esq. or Phillip Kim, Esq. of The Rosen Law Firm toll free at 866-767-3653 or via e-mail at lrosen@rosenlegal.com or pkim@rosenlegal.com. The Rosen Law Firm has expertise in prosecuting investor securities litigation and extensive experience in actions involving financial fraud. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the nation, concentrating its practice in securities class actions. |
|
|
|
|
Recent Lawyer News Updates |
|
|