|
|
|
Appeals Court Upholds Isley's Sentence
Court Feed News |
2008/02/12 12:04
|
An appellate court has upheld Ronald Isley's 37-month federal prison sentence for tax evasion. The three-judge panel rejected the 66-year-old R&B singer's argument that his sentence was unreasonable due to his age, poor health and lack of proof that the federal prison system can provide him adequate health care. In its ruling, the appellate court said the trial judge was correct in sentencing and "best balanced the need to sanction Mr. Isley's `pathological' tax evasion against the need to accommodate Mr. Isley's poor health." Isley was sentenced in 2006 after being convicted of five counts of tax evasion and one count of willful failure to file a tax return. Prosecutors said Isley avoided paying taxes numerous times over a three-year period and declared bankruptcy after the IRS seized his yacht, cars and other property in 1997. He was discharged from bankruptcy four years later, but then did not file tax returns for the years 1997 to 2001 and in 2002 did not sign his return and failed to pay all taxes due. Isley suffered a minor stroke in July 2004, but got married one year later and continuously performed concerts at that time. He is incarcerated at the Terre Haute Federal Corrections Institution in Indiana and his projected release date is in April 2010. Isley was inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame and was part of the Isley Brothers, whose hits included "Twist and Shout" and "This Old Heart of Mine (Is Weak for You)." |
|
|
|
|
|
How tax rebates work in stimulus package
Lawyer News |
2008/02/12 11:09
|
On Wednesday, President Bush is expected to sign the economic stimulus bill that provides tax rebates to most low- and middle-income Americans. Here are details of the plan, along with answers to questions about it from readers. Under HR5140, the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008, most working people will get $600 if they are single or $1,200 if they file a joint return, assuming they paid at least that much in federal income tax in 2007. To help people who earn little or nothing - and might be more likely to spend their rebates - Congress said that anyone who had at least $3,000 in income from a job, self-employment, Social Security and/or certain veterans benefits would get a flat rebate of $300 if single or $600 if married filing jointly, even if they don't owe income tax. If your 2007 federal tax liability is between $300 and $600 (single) or $600 and $1,200 (married), your rebate will be equal to whatever you paid in tax. Anyone who gets a rebate of any size will get an additional $300 for each child eligible for the child tax credit in 2008. To qualify, the child must be younger than 17 on Dec. 31, 2008. Higher-income people won't get anything. The rebates - including the $300 rebate for kids - start to shrink when your adjusted gross income hits $75,000 (single) or $150,000 (married). Adjusted gross income includes income from all sources, but before most deductions and exemptions have been subtracted. The rebate is reduced by $50 for every $1,000 you earn above the income limit. It disappears at some point which varies depending on your family size. Singles with more than $87,000 in gross income and couples with more than $174,000 get no rebate if they have no children. Those with children can earn a bit more before losing their rebate because it's bigger to start out with. A married couple with two kids, for example, get no rebate when their income exceeds $186,000, says Mark Luscombe, principal tax analyst with CCH. Rebates will not be sent to nonresident aliens (you must have a Social Security number to get a rebate), estates, trusts or people who are or could be claimed as a dependent on someone else's tax return. That means most high school and many college students won't get a rebate even if they earn more than $3,000 or pay taxes. The Internal Revenue Service will start issuing rebates - via check or possibly direct deposit - in early May. The rebates represent a 2008 tax cut. But instead of getting the tax cut next year, when you file your 2008 return, you'll get it this year. The IRS, however, will use your 2007 tax return to determine who gets a rebate and how much. If it turns out that you would have gotten a bigger tax rebate based on your 2008 tax return, the IRS will refund you the difference. For example, a middle-income family that has a baby born in 2008 should be able to reap an extra $300 when they file their tax return next year, Luscombe says. On the other hand, if you would have gotten a smaller rebate based on your 2008 return, you won't have to pay back the difference, says Bob Scharin, RIA Senior Tax Analyst from Thomson Tax & Accounting. Most rebates will be out by the summer, but if you don't file your 2007 taxes until the extended Oct. 15 deadline, you won't get yours until year end, CCH reports. Unlike the 2001 rebates, which went only to people who paid tax, the 2008 rebates will go to many people who don't file tax returns. The IRS says it will work with the Social Security Administration and Department of Veterans Affairs to make sure all eligible individuals know how to get a rebate. Tax advisers are encouraging people who had more than $3,000 in income from a job or self-employment in 2007 to file a tax return even if they don't owe tax so the IRS knows how to find them. The IRS has been warning taxpayers not to fall for telephone or e-mail scams that use the rebate as bait. The perpetrators try to trick people into revealing personal information they use to steal their identities. The IRS never sends unsolicited e-mails. Also be wary of banks and loan companies that offer refund anticipation loans that include the anticipated rebates when a 2007 return is filed. While apparently legal, these loans can be extremely costly. |
|
|
|
|
|
Law firm installs mock courtroom, TV gear
Headline News |
2008/02/11 16:20
|
It's a high-tech mock courtroom where jurors with hand-held "perception analyzers" can twist a dial to rate a lawyer's performance - the same kind of testing the television industry uses to evaluate new entertainment shows. Lawyers can show evidence to jurors via video projection equipment, and in a nearby room they can watch to see what jurors like and dislike by watching real-time results of the panel's reactions. Built of cherry wood and designed from blueprints of courtrooms in the Matheson and West Jordan courthouses - the new $250,000 courtroom is not in any courthouse, but at the personal-injury law firm of Siegfried & Jensen. "Jurors expect to see cases presented the way it is on television," said law partner Mitchell Jensen. "Instead of describing an accident, it is replayed for them." At least one 3rd District Court judge is trying the technology. A LCD projector, screen and switchbox donated by LawMedia Center, which is building Siegfried & Jensen's system, were recently installed in Judge Paul Maughan's courtroom. Maughan believes the equipment will allow for speedier and more efficient trials, while generating less paperwork, state courts spokeswoman Nancy Volmer said. Prosecutors used the system earlier this month to display crime scene photos and other information during closing arguments in Floyd Eugene Maestas' capital murder trial. "Nothing in Utah approaches this right now," said James McConkie, of Parker and McConkie, who recently partnered with Siegfried & Jensen. "It allows us to make a more powerful presentation in court." "We can do a complete dry run of a trial," added law partner Ned Siegfried. While jurors deliberate their verdict, attorneys can electronically eavesdrop to learn how they reached their decision. In an alcove at the rear of the mock courtroom, the firm has built what amounts to a small television production studio. The equipment can be used to remotely depose a witness in another state, allow others to watch video depositions from elsewhere and to video-conference with other attorneys.
Lawyer Bradley Parker said the high-tech video depositions are more effective than paper depositions. The equipment can be used to incorporate video, photos, documents and diagrams into the deposition record. "You can blow it up, highlight it and draw on it, just like they do during the Super Bowl," he said. Another example: "If we catch a witness in a lie and sweat starts to form on his forehead, we can zoom in for a close-up," Parker said. McConkie said the video equipment helped quickly settle the case of a woman who claimed her back was injured. The woman was being deposed when she was shown covert video of herself lifting a heavy set of barbells at a garage sale. The television production equipment was also used in the case of a 5-year-old boy crippled at birth because of a lack of oxygen. "We put together a settlement CD showing the baby walking and eating and running, sitting, putting on a shirt, and [the caregivers] settled before litigation began," McConkie said. "They could see what kind of client it was and how it would affect the jury," McConkie said. Jensen said video helps humanize dead and injured clients. "It's hard to tell a story that's so personal without showing them," Jensen said. "It makes it personal. It's no longer a statement about an injury, it's a personal injury."
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. to seek death penalty against 9/11 planner
Lawyer Blog News |
2008/02/11 14:16
|
The Pentagon is planning to charge six detainees at Guantanamo Bay for the Sept. 11 terror attacks on America and seek the death penalty. Defense Department spokesman Bryan Whitman said an announcement of the charges could come Monday.
U.S. military prosecutors will file charges on Monday against the alleged mastermind of the Sept. 11 attacks and five other Guantanamo prisoners and will seek to execute them if they are convicted, officials involved in the process said.
The charges against former al Qaeda operations chief Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and five other captives will be announced in an 11 a.m. EST (1600 GMT) news conference at the Pentagon. They will be the first charges from the Guantanamo war court alleging direct involvement in the attacks and the first involving the death penalty. |
|
|
|
|
|
Lawyer accused of way-too-firm handshake
Court Feed News |
2008/02/11 13:28
|
A lawyer who allegedly shook a legal opponent's hand so fiercely she injured her shoulder is now facing physical assault charges in Florida.
An attorney for private lawyer Brewer Rentas said her client never intended to harm a federal prosecutor in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., when they shook hands last week, the South Florida Sun-Sentinel reported.
"It all stems from a handshake," attorney Gwendolyn Tuggle said. "In her mind she never intended to cause any harm to any federal official."
The 49-year-old Rentas had been in court Thursday as part of her husband's trial on cocaine distribution charges and the attorney reportedly made a point of shaking hands with Assistant U.S. Attorney Jennifer Keene after the court's ruling.
Rentas' arrest report states she then allegedly grabbed Keene's hand, knocking her off balance, and then roughly shook her arm up and down.
The Sun-Sentinel said Rentas is now facing a federal misdemeanor charge over the incident and will likely face an attorney conduct review, as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
Have 2 firms? Make sure they relate
Attorney Blogs |
2008/02/11 11:24
|
For some entrepreneurs, opportunity knocks again and again.
While practicing corporate real estate law at Jenner & Block, Jennifer Sara Levin saw an opportunity to make a difference in the lives of other professionals by sharing what she had learned about building a client base.
So she launched a business-relationship consulting firm, NateandDot.com, in January 2006 and left the law firm seven months later to focus on it. Last year, the self-described multitasker launched a concurrent business, Legal Intelligence, an online platform connecting law school students with top-tier firms, in part by applying what she had learned about recruiting at major law firms.
Many people have asked Levin how she juggles both start-ups.
"I'm one of those people who is significantly more efficient when I'm busy," she said. "I try to stack my days for efficiency."
She schedules several downtown meetings on the same day, works nights as needed and relies heavily on communicating via her BlackBerry, Levin said.
While unusual, it's not unheard of for business owners to run two enterprises simultaneously, experts said. The phenomenon occurs most often when entrepreneurs see an opening in the marketplace that is somehow related to their first business and go for it.
They are more likely to succeed when the second business is strategic and not just opportunistic, said Linda Darragh, director of entrepreneurship programs at the University of Chicago.
"Look for a strategic link and a reason they fit together," she said.
For example, Darragh said, a holding company with three separate enterprises all supporting the restaurant industry, offering management, financing and data-processing services, could be effective.
"They link together in terms of cross-selling and some systems," she said.
But with no synergy, managing two enterprises at the same time could be a recipe for disaster, Darragh said, because most entrepreneurs are limited in time and money.
"If you're dividing your resources between two companies, you may be jeopardizing both at the same time," she said.
Levin's two companies have target markets with some overlap and share many core competencies, she said. She researched emotional intelligence and hired an industrial psychologist and cognitive behaviorist to learn the best way to teach networking and communication skills, which apply to both businesses, she said.
Client Sherwin Brook of Chicago accounting firm BrookWeiner said Levin did a stellar job developing a seminar for its young professionals on developing contacts and client relationships. The niche Levin has carved out has great potential, he said, because it is largely overlooked.
Pilot at Northwestern
Levin is just gearing up a pilot program for Legal Intelligence LLC, involving three law firms and her alma mater, Northwestern University School of Law, that will run online at http://www.legalintelllc.com from May 15 to Oct. 15. The idea is to help students find the law firm that fits them best, partly through online video conferences.
"It's like a Match.com for law students," Levin said of her second start-up.
Law firms pay to participate, Levin said, because they want to find law school graduates who aren't just qualified but who also share their firm's values. Often, Levin said, top-tier law firms end up with graduates who don't fit their culture.
"There's no way to do it in a 20-minute interview. You can't get enough information to know if this person is the right cultural fit," she said.
Still, growing two companies at once can be difficult, especially if investors react with skepticism, said Scott Meadow, professor at the University of Chicago Graduate School of Business.
"Unless I had Steve Jobs for both companies, I doubt I would consider backing someone who was working on two different deals," Meadow said.
So what should entrepreneurs do when they are enticed by a new opportunity? Before launching a new business, Meadow said, "you ought to sell that first one, get that off your mind. Then turn to something else." If you make money on the first enterprise, the second one will be that much easier to fund, he said.
Jay Goltz, president of the $15 million-plus Goltz Group, runs three separate operations, with design as the common thread.
He started Artists' Frame Service in 1978, then opened Jayson Home & Garden, a combined home and garden furnishings store, in 1996, in part to give Artists' Frame Service customers a place to shop while their art was being framed. Meantime, his 15-year-old Chicago Art Source aims to tap the corporate market.
"It always started from seeing an unfulfilled need in the marketplace and thinking I could do that better," he said.
Goltz said each time he came up with the new business concept, he thought it would be easy to make it work.
"I tend to jump into the deep end and figure it out later," he said.
Leaps sometimes painful
The process is sometimes painful. He faced several learning curves before he began to identify important differences among the three operations and adapt accordingly, he said.
"The same thing that can be a great asset also can be a liability," Goltz said.
Jayson Home & Garden has seasonal inventory challenges that Artists' Frame Service doesn't have. And Chicago Art Source requires a different type of sales representative than the two retail operations need.
"It has to be someone who understands the corporate market," said Goltz, who employs 115 workers.
Goltz also made some mistakes. For example, he tried opening another business that sold wholesale frames to large department stores, but differences in the market, receivables and inventory proved too great.
He closed it six months after its launch, he said.
Still, Goltz embraces the concept of leveraging core competencies to pursue new business.
"Some people say to stick to the knitting, but if you just stick to the knitting, that would leave enormous opportunities," he said.
Today, Goltz's three operations are successful, he said, because he has the right people in place to manage them.
"It's about finding talent and developing it," he said. "I have less stress today than I've ever had because I have hired key people to run these businesses, and they are doing a good job." |
|
|
|
|
Recent Lawyer News Updates |
|
|