|
|
|
AZ Law Firm Hired to Handle UT Ski Bus Case
Law Firm News |
2008/01/11 17:16
|
A Scottsdale law firm announced Thursday that it is representing two families who suffered injuries and one death Jan. 6 after a ski bus rolled 41 feet down an embankment in southern Utah.
Nine died and 23 were injured in the accident near Mexican Hat, Utah.
The Rasmussen and Torres families have hired Scott A. Maasenand Jeffry R.Gill of M.G. Law Group, a personal injury firm specializing in trucking and bus cases.
Marc Rasmussen, an 18-year-old Deer Valley High School senior, died in the wreckage. His mother, Kim, and four other family members, including a 5-year-old boy, were injured.
Some family members have been released, but Kim remains hospitalized in the San Juan Regional Hospital in Farmington, N.M.
The firm also represents the family of Daniel Torres, 18, Willow Canyon High School student in Surprise.
Maasen said friends of the victims contacted his firm this week. He began interviewing them Tuesday.
He said it is too early to say whether the families will file a lawsuit against Arrow Stage Lines, the Nebraska-based motor coach company contracted to take 17 busloads of skiers to and from Telluride, Colo., for a three-day ski trip Jan.3-6.
"That is the last thing on the victim's minds," Maasen said of a lawsuit. "What is on their minds is getting better and healing."
The National Transportation Safety Board and Utah Highway Patrol are conducting an investigation into the cause of the Jan. 6 accident on State Route 163, near Mexican Hat in southern Utah.
The investigation includes analysis of a "data collector" on board the bus that logs speed at the time of the accident, its exact position on the high desert highway, and records video of the driver.
A Utah Highway patrolman who investigated the accident said the driver, Walland Lotan, 71, was driving at the 65 mph speed limit when he rounded a tight curve, plunging the 52 passengers into the embankment. But Sgt. Rick Eldredge said the driver should have slowed by several miles an hour as he approached the curve.
Maasen said his firm is doing its own probe of the deadly wreck.
"There are a lot of pieces to this puzzle," he said. "We want to know why this happened." |
|
|
|
|
|
Not Guilty Plea in Nev. Sex Tape Case
Court Feed News |
2008/01/10 16:55
|
A man accused of raping a little girl after a videotape of the child being assaulted was found in the Nevada desert pleaded not guilty Wednesday, and a judge set a trial date for April. Chester Arthur Stiles, 37, stood next to his appointed lawyers and stared at the floor, saying little during his four-minute arraignment in Clark County District Court. Stiles is accused of sexually assaulting a 2-year-old girl in September 2003, and a 6-year-old girl that December. Authorities say the videotape is of the first attack. Stiles faces 22 felony charges including lewdness with a child under 14, sexual assault with a child under 14 and attempted sexual assault with a child under 14. If convicted, he could face multiple life terms in prison. The judge set trial for April 14. Stiles was returned to jail, where he has been held since his Oct. 15 arrest in what authorities have called protective isolation. Stiles' lawyer Jeff Banks said he intends to seek bail. Stiles became the object of a nationwide manhunt after a Nye County man turned the videotape over to sheriff's investigators in Pahrump, a town some 60 miles west of Las Vegas. Authorities released images from the tape and pleaded for public help to find the girl and her alleged attacker. The girl was found safe with her mother in Las Vegas on Sept. 28. Stiles was arrested after police in the suburb of Henderson stopped him driving a car with no license plates. The man who turned the tape over, 27-year-old Darrin Tuck, remained jailed Wednesday in Pahrump on a probation violation. Tuck said he found the tape in the desert, and his lawyer has said Tuck had no involvement with Stiles. Tuck has pleaded not guilty to a felony charge of possession of child pornography, which carries a possible penalty of one to six years in state prison. No trial date has been set. |
|
|
|
|
|
Chicago law firms expand in Charlotte
Headline News |
2008/01/10 13:04
|
In 1998, Chicago law firm Mayer Brown established an office in Charlotte to be close to that city's bankers. A decade later, its local rivals are trying to muscle in on what has become a lucrative financial-services center.
Winston & Strawn became the latest to jump into the heated Charlotte legal market, announcing Wednesday that it hired away six partners from one of the city's leading firms, Kennedy Covington Lobdell & Hickman. The Chicago-based law firm anticipates that it will add up to a dozen more lawyers from Kennedy Covington, said Thomas Fitzgerald, Winston & Strawn's managing partner.
Charlotte's banking giants, Bank of America Corp. and Wachovia Corp., have turned this drowsy Sunbelt city into a financial powerhouse second only to New York. Chicago once competed for such financial stature when it was home to two of the nation's biggest banks, Continental and First Chicago.
But pro-small-bank laws in Illinois placed so many restrictions on big institutions that expansion became difficult and resulted in today's fragmented Chicago banking market. Consolidation may be on its way, though, after Bank of America acquired LaSalle Bank last year.
In fact, Bank of America's growing presence in Chicago was one of the factors that led Winston & Strawn to target Charlotte for expansion, Fitzgerald said. The firm counts both Charlotte banks as clients in its corporate finance and lending practice but wanted to deepen those ties.
"We believe that our existing relationship with those clients will be enhanced with these individuals," Fitzgerald said. "This was an opportunity to bring additional depth and strength to our lending practice."
To build a stronger business relationship with the Charlotte banks, it helps to have lawyers in the city, said Jay Monge, a partner at Mayer Brown, who relocated to Charlotte from New York in 1999. The year before, Mayer Brown had acquired a boutique tax practice in Charlotte that did a lot of work for Bank of America's predecessor, NationsBank. (In 1998, NationsBank acquired San Francisco's BankAmerica, which had earlier purchased Continental.)
Katten Muchin Rosenman followed Mayer Brown to Charlotte, opening an office in 1999. There was little expansion to Charlotte after that, as Chicago firms looked overseas at the beginning of the decade. Some firms are also reluctant to move to Charlotte because the lawyers there generally charge lower rates than those in Chicago.
But the growth of the Charlotte banks has powered the city's economy, spurring demand for legal services in other areas such as real estate and litigation. Other financial institutions also have sprung up to service the banks, further diversifying Charlotte's financial-services industry.
"For multioffice firms that aspire to have a significant financial practice, Charlotte is a critical element," Monge said.
Indeed, last year three national law firms, including Chicago's Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal, opened offices in Charlotte. The others were Atlanta's King & Spalding and New York-based Dewey Ballantine, now Dewey & LeBoeuf.
"It's been a very good legal market for us," said Elliott Portnoy, chairman of Sonnenschein, which recently added a group of litigators in Charlotte.
Winston & Strawn becomes the second national firm to move into Charlotte in 2008, following Atlanta's Powell Goldstein. The moves send a strong signal that the demand for financial-services lawyers in Charlotte has not abated, even with the cloudier outlook for the financial-services industry brought on by the meltdown in the subprime mortgage market.
"This short-term turbulence is not going to affect our ability to build a long-term office," Fitzgerald said.
The more firms that move to Charlotte, the more it helps dispel any lingering notion among lawyers of Charlotte as a sleepy backwater, Monge said. To any naysayers, he likes to boast that Charlotte, unlike Chicago, has a Dean & DeLuca gourmet food store. More than one. |
|
|
|
|
|
Banks Targeted by Italy's First Class-Action Suit
Class Action News |
2008/01/10 11:56
|
Consumer group Adusbef plans to fight Italian banks' use of a certain type of compound interest on loans, in what could lead to Italy's first class-action lawsuit, a statement from the group said. A recently enacted law will allow class-action lawsuits -- commonplace in the countries such as the United States -- to be filed in Italy starting July 2008. Adusbef, which focuses on financial services matters, wants to take aim at the so-called practice of anatocism, where compound interest is calculated on the initial loan plus interest that is accumulated each time the money comes due. "We want to start from the most hated banking practice, this form of usury that is known as anatocism," Adusbef said. That is opposed to using simple interest, in which only the interest on the original money borrowed is added. Although banned by the Italian civil law code, Italian banks have been using compound interest for over 50 years, Adusbef said. No-one at Italian banking association ABI was immediately available for comment. |
|
|
|
|
|
2 Lawyers Quit High-Profile Bribery Case
Legal Career News |
2008/01/10 10:07
|
Two members of a law firm that was searched by federal agents last month have resigned as defense attorneys in the high-profile bribery case involving wealthy lawyer Richard "Dickie" Scruggs. Now a third lawyer in the case is asking to do the same. U.S. District Judge Neal Biggers on Tuesday granted the request by Joey Langston and Billy Quin of the Langston Law Firm to withdraw as attorneys for Scruggs, according to court records filed Tuesday in federal court in Oxford. Scruggs, his son Zach and three others were indicted Nov. 28 on charges they conspired to bribe a judge in a case involving disputed fees related to lawsuits from Hurricane Katrina. On Wednesday, Anthony Farese, an attorney for Zach Scruggs, also asked to withdraw from the case. He said in court papers that Zach Scruggs has "terminated his services" and intends to hire a new lawyer. Biggers declined the request because the younger Scruggs has not yet named a replacement for Farese. The elder Scruggs, a brother-in-law of former Sen. Trent Lott, is best known for making millions from tobacco litigation. One of Langston's former law partners, Timothy Balducci, pleaded guilty Dec. 4 to conspiracy in the bribery case and is helping investigators. He had been one of those indicted along with Scruggs and his son. On Dec. 10, the FBI searched the Langston Law Firm. FBI officials would not say what they were looking for, but Farese said at the time that they took records from cases that Balducci had worked on before he left the firm. Quin and Langston did not respond to several messages left Tuesday by The Associated Press. John Keker, another attorney for the elder Scruggs, would not comment on why the two would no longer be working on the case. In a separate case, a judge ruled Wednesday that an insurance company can question Richard and Zach Scruggs about their handling of leaked documents in a Hurricane Katrina insurance case. Richard Scruggs wore "two hats" as the employer and lawyer for two key witnesses in that case, U.S. District Judge L.T. Senter Jr. ruled. After Hurricane Katrina, Scruggs announced that sisters Cori and Kerri Rigsby, former employees of a State Farm contractor, were helping him build cases against insurance companies over their handling of storm claims. The sisters gave him thousands of internal State Farm records. Scruggs hired the Rigsby sisters as consultants for $150,000 a year and served as their lawyer. State Farm wants to know more about those relationships. Scruggs has said the leaked records proved that State Farm fraudulently denied the claim of policyholders Thomas and Pamela McIntosh, whose Biloxi home was destroyed by the storm on Aug. 29, 2005. Also on Wednesday, attorney Kenneth Coghlan notified Biggers that he intended to represent Richard Scruggs in the bribery case. Biggers refused to allow Coghlan, however, because the attorney represented another defendant in the case — former state auditor Steven Patterson — before withdrawing last month. Allowing Coghlan to represent Scruggs could be a conflict of interest if one defendant testifies against the other, Biggers said. |
|
|
|
|
|
De Beers Diamonds Settles Class Action Lawsuit
Class Action News |
2008/01/10 09:57
|
If you bought diamonds over the last decade, you might be entitled to some money back. The mining company De Beers is settling a $295 million class action lawsuit. De Beers was accused of fixing diamond prices and monopolizing the market. The case involves diamonds bought from 1994 through March of 2006. The amount of money you can get depends on how much you paid an the quality of the diamonds.
https://www.diamondsclassaction.com
|
|
|
|
|
Recent Lawyer News Updates |
|
|